In addition, Azure capabilities and options are continuously improving, and staying abreast can be time-consuming. The Azure administrative interface initially appears to be straightforward, but there are many options and intricacies, such as networking choices and resource allocations. Administration of Azure and WVD may be overwhelming for those that only do so occasionally, for instance. There are a few reasons why some organization may not use Windows Virtual Desktop. For example, customer service representatives working from home primarily accessing Microsoft Office 365 applications, including Dynamics, could benefit from secure, easy access to WVD.Ī strong Windows Virtual Desktop use case is small businesses that don't have the resources to focus on IT and where cloud computing is appropriate from a cost and technical perspective. In addition, straightforward user compute requirements are a good reason why to use Windows Virtual Desktop. Rather than issue a computer or VPN network access to address this intermittent use, users can access WVD desktops as necessary, which minimizes management and cost. WVD is also a fine option for contractors and partners that require occasional access to centralized resources.
Similarly, from a security standpoint, WVD provides built-in functionality and options that are not realistic for small businesses to deploy internally. Rather than a small business owner or manager spending time deploying computers, assisting users with issues, installing and upgrading applications, and managing network infrastructure, WVD provides Windows 10 virtual desktops hosted in the cloud. A strong Windows Virtual Desktop use case is small businesses that don't have the resources to focus on IT and where cloud computing is appropriate from a cost and technical perspective.
0 kommentar(er)
